It was completely different, and there was definitely a learning curve. It wasn't until my second book that I discovered Scrivener. Inevitably, I would forget to copy an important line of text that belonged with the section I was moving and the whole thing wouldn't make any sense.
Often as not, I would decide the section I just moved fit better where it first was, and I would have to go move it back. I had to scroll, scroll, scroll, highlight the section, click “cut,” scroll, scroll, scroll to the place I wanted to put it, paste, and then re-read the section to see if I liked it there. I was in the middle of the second draft, and I kept have to reorganize sections to see what would make the book flow best. In 2010, I was writing what would become my first book when I got to a point where Word became impossible. How Scrivener Saved Me 250 Hours Writing a Book
WRITEITNOW TEMPORARY SAVE SOFTWARE
Plus, check out our Top 10 Pieces of Software for Writers for more tools to help you write better and faster. In this post, we're going to look closely at two of the best pieces of book writing software: Microsoft Word and Scrivener, and talk about where each word processor shines and where each falls short. And especially when you're writing something as complicated as book, you might want a piece of writing software geared specifically toward writing a book. Microsoft Word is the default word processor, but that doesn't mean it's the only option. There has to be a better piece of book writing software than Microsoft Word.” So now, even if a lot of data has to be written to disk and the crash happens there, the previous backup file would still be available.When you're writing a book, you might come to this point where exasperation turns to desperation and you think: “There has to be a better way. I adapted the function write_backup_data(), so that it writes to a temporary file first and then replaces the old file. In that case the file would probably be corrupt and the data lost. My first solution just wrote the data to disk (which solves part of the problem), but it could still happen, that the program crashes the moment when writing to disk. The main problem here is: Restoring data, even if the program gets interrupted at any time (due to power interruption or whatever). Additionally, the safer temporary file approach (see Edit below) would not work.Įdit: I just reconsidered your use case. A more sophisticated approach would be to just append the newly added positions, but then the synchronizing part, that I described before, would be more complicated too. The data is written to disk completely new every time.This is needed to "synchronize" the data on disk. stageddata is written to disk when it hits the backup_interval (obviously), but also when transmission returns True within the while loop.The tempfile is not a pythonic solution, as it cannot easily be retrieved in case the program crashes. Alternatives are JSON, which is human readable, or msgpack, which might be faster, but needs an extra package to be installed. I use the built-in pickle module, since the data does not have to be human readable or transformable for other programming languages.With the variable backup_interval, it is possible to control how often a backup is written to disk.
WRITEITNOW TEMPORARY SAVE CODE
I moved your code into some some functions. I am using a SD card as storage, so i am not sure, if writing every element to a file would be the best solution. What would be the best a pythonic solution to save this data? If connection can be reestablished, all list items will be transmitted.īut if the a power interruption occurs, all temp data elements will be lost. If I have no coverage, the data will be saved in a list. I read position data from a GPS Sensor in a dictionary, which I am sending in cyclic interval to a server.
0 kommentar(er)
